![]() And if you do not pay attention to it, it will be a planned gap in the strategic future. Like properties, each of the indicators can serve as a comprehensive with respect to indicators of their own structure and as a private in relation to that of higher level properties.īy the mid-90's almost all technological advance, accumulated in the 80's - early 90-ies through funding by the Soviet Union expired. ![]() Indicator in assessing the entire structure of their own properties, called the complex. Military-technical level of the tanks of the Russian Federation and NATO Įach of the properties of the sample is estimated by its index. Increase the combat potential of the park BTVT NATO countries in Europe are currently planned due to the upgrading of existing tanks. After the appearance abroad in the mid-90 tanks, tank modifications M1A2SEP, Leopard 2A6, Challenger-2, as well as the "Leclerc", there has been lagging domestic tanks on military-technical level. Until the late 80's on these measures domestic tanks were indisputable superiority over NATO tanks, but by the early 90's things began to change for the worse for the domestic tank production side. Domestic tanks have several advantages: a low silhouette and a smaller mass, the presence of guided weapons (CUW), automatic loader, a smaller crew, ease to use and reliable in operation and in the 80 years added to them yet and the system of remote blasting fragmentation explosive projectile (FFS). ![]() This is taking into account the quantitative superiority BTVT provides a significantly higher potential park Warsaw Pact and the Soviet Union in particular, with respect to NATO countries. In the 60 - 70th years in the USSR troops received about 20,000 modern tanks, which the technical levels than Western models. Comparison of the combat features and layout modern T-90 and foreign tanks ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |